Google’s Stance on AI Regulation
If there was any doubt about Google’s commitment to move fast and break things, its new policy position should put that to rest. “For too long, AI policymaking has paid disproportionate attention to the risks,” the document says.
Investing in AI with Business-Friendly Legislation
Google urges the US to invest in AI not only with money but with business-friendly legislation. The company joins the growing chorus of AI firms calling for federal legislation that clarifies how AI firms can operate. It points to the difficulty of complying with a “patchwork” of state-level laws that impose restrictions on AI development and use. If you want to know what keeps Google’s policy wonks up at night, look no further than the vetoed SB-1047 bill in California, which would have enforced AI safety measures.
The Importance of a National AI Framework
According to Google, a national AI framework that supports innovation is necessary to push the boundaries of what artificial intelligence can do. Taking a page from the gun lobby, Google opposes attempts to hold the creators of AI liable for the way those models are used. Generative AI systems are non-deterministic, making it impossible to fully predict their output. Google wants clearly defined responsibilities for AI developers, deployers, and end users—it would, however, clearly prefer most of those responsibilities fall on others.
Concerns Over Stringent Regulations
There are efforts underway in some countries that would implement stringent regulations that force companies like Google to make their tools more transparent. For example, the EU’s AI Act would require AI firms to publish an overview of training data and possible risks associated with their products. Google believes this would force the disclosure of trade secrets that would allow foreign adversaries to more easily duplicate its work, mirroring concerns that OpenAI expressed in its policy proposal.
Promoting Light-Touch Regulation
Google wants the government to push back on these efforts at the diplomatic level. The company would like to be able to release AI products around the world, and the best way to ensure it has that option is to promote light-touch regulation that “reflects US values and approaches.” That is, Google’s values and approaches.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Google’s stance on AI regulation is clear: it wants a national AI framework that supports innovation and opposes stringent regulations that could limit its ability to operate. The company believes that light-touch regulation is the best way to promote the development and use of AI, and it wants the government to push back against efforts to impose stricter regulations.
FAQs
Q: What is Google’s position on AI regulation?
A: Google wants a national AI framework that supports innovation and opposes attempts to hold the creators of AI liable for the way those models are used.
Q: Why does Google oppose stringent regulations?
A: Google believes that stringent regulations would force the disclosure of trade secrets and limit its ability to operate.
Q: What kind of regulation does Google want?
A: Google wants light-touch regulation that reflects US values and approaches.
